Effectiveness of Online Tools in Enhancing Interactive Learning in Undergraduate Community Medicine Teaching

Authors

  • Umme Kulsoom Khattak Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Muddsar Hameed Brain Tech Clinical Research Center, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Sajeel Turab Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Linta Masroor Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0972-2492

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32413/pjph.v15i4.1898

Keywords:

Online learning tools, Interactive lectures, medical teaching, Slido, Socrative, Student engagement, innovative learning methods

Abstract

Background: The integration of digital tools into higher education is pivotal for enhancing pedagogical strategies. This study evaluates the specific impact of online interactive platforms on student engagement and active learning within a competency-based medical curriculum, addressing a gap in comparative efficacy analysis.

Methodology: A mixed-methods approach was employed over one academic semester. A cohort of 142 second-year medical students was exposed to integrated sessions using two platforms, Socrative and Kahoot!, within a foundational course. Quantitative data were collected via platform analytics measuring participation rates, response accuracy, and longitudinal engagement. Qualitative feedback was gathered through structured post-intervention surveys and focus groups to assess perceived engagement and utility.

Results: Both tools markedly improved active participation, with an average response rate of 96% across all sessions. However, key quantitative differences emerged. Socrative demonstrated a 22% higher rate in sustained in-session participation metrics and was associated with a 31% reduction in student-reported distractions compared to Kahoot!. Survey data indicated that 84% of students found Socrative’s pace and format more conducive to complex problem-solving. Statistical analysis confirmed these differences were significant (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The findings robustly indicate that while both interactive tools are effective, Socrative offers distinct advantages in maintaining focused cognitive engagement. The most important figures, including the 22% higher sustained participation and 31% reduction in distractions, provide compelling evidence for tool selection. Strategically incorporating such platforms, with attention to their specific interactive architectures, can significantly strengthen the pedagogical efficacy of medical training programs, fostering a more attentive and dynamically engaged learning environment.

Author Biographies

  • Umme Kulsoom Khattak, Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Dr. Umme Kulsoom Khattak

    Professor Community Medicine 

    Shifa College of Medicine 

  • Muddsar Hameed, Brain Tech Clinical Research Center, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Muddsar Hameed

    Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University 

  • Muhammad Sajeel Turab, Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Muhammad Sajeel Turab, student

  • Linta Masroor, Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Linta Masroor 

    Shifa College of Medicine final year student 

     

Downloads

Published

24-12-2025

How to Cite

1.
Khattak UK, Hameed M, Turab MS, Masroor L. Effectiveness of Online Tools in Enhancing Interactive Learning in Undergraduate Community Medicine Teaching. Pak J Public Health [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 24 [cited 2026 Jan. 22];15(4):111-7. Available from: https://pjph.org/pjph/article/view/1898